Comments on: WANTED: Dead or Alive

By: GABRIELA VARGAS

GABRIELA VARGAS — Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:23:33 +0000

LA CACERÍA ES UN CRIMEN SIN DUDA ALGUNA, QUE LO JUSTIFIQUEN CON “SALVAGUARDAR EL EQUILIBRIO DE LA NATURALEZA” ES LA PEOR IDEA DE IGNORANTES QUE GANAN DINERO CON ESO. NADA JUSTIFICA LA CACERÍA. NO DEJAREMOS DE INSISTIR EN ESTE PUNTO, HASTA LOGRAR LEYES RÍGIDAS E INAMOVIBLES QUE PROTEJAN A TODAS LAS ESPECIES DEL BRUTAL Y COBARDE CAZADOR.

By: Robert Klyce

Robert Klyce — Sun, 21 Aug 2016 05:40:08 +0000

Trophy hunting is incomprehensible to me. But you raise good questions in your article, and I am aware of conservation benefits provided by responsible hunting practices. However, it’s certainly not an ideal state of affairs (though we don’t live in an ideal world.) My view is that wildlife and wilderness bear intrinsic value and native integrity independent of any extrinsic value ascribed to them by human beings. I also believe stewardship, care and reverence for creation are virtues inherent in human dignity, i.e. in what makes people truly, fully human, in the best sense. Finally, metaphysically speaking, existence = essence [viz. species] instantiated in individuals at least as much as in populations. And each individual, including a non-human one (science demonstrates this more and more), is a unique, unrepeatable, awesome mystery…So if trophy hunting is something we have to do, then so be it. But in my view, it’s too bad that it has to be that way. Thanks so much, Bob

By: GABRIELA VARGAS

GABRIELA VARGAS — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:27:22 +0000

LOS TROFEOS DE CACERÍA NO TIENEN SENTIDO Y NO AYUDAN EN NADA, ABSOLUTAMENTE NADA AL EQUILIBRIO DE LA NATURALEZA. NO ES CIERTO. NADA JUSTIFICA EL CRIMEN DE LA CACERÍA. O…… PODRÍA CAZAR SERES HUMANOS???? YA QUE ESO SÍ CONTRIBUYE AL EQUILIBRIO DE LA NATURALEZA. PERO NO, NO SE PUEDE, TAMPOCO CON LOS ANIMALES!!!!!!!!! ADEMÁS LA CACERÍA DE ANIMALES NO CONTRIBUYE EN NADA, EN NINGÚN BENEFICIO PARA NADIE.